Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:32

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
8 Things Knee Doctors Say You Should Never, Ever Do - HuffPost
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
In the last 500 years, have there been civilizations whose cruelty matched that of Nazi Germany?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do boobs of some girls bounce when they walk?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Would you date/marry a guy younger than you? If no, why not?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Is it okay for my husband to help other ladies without telling me?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Fortnite Map Changes In Chapter 6 Season 3: Super - GameSpot
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?